An Integrated Human–computer System for Controlling Interstate Disputes
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we develop a scientific approach to control intercountry conflict. This system makes use of a neural network and a feedback control approach. It was found that by controlling the four controllable inputs: Democracy, Dependency, Allies and Capability simultaneously, all the predicted dispute outcomes could be avoided. Furthermore, it was observed that controlling a single input Dependency or Capability also avoids all the predicted conflicts. When the influence of each input variable on conflict is assessed, Dependency, Capability, and Democracy emerge as key variables that influence conflict.
منابع مشابه
Charting a Course to Conflict: Territorial Issues and Interstate Conflict, 1816-1992 Paul R. Hensel
Contentious issues have frequently been overlooked in the study of international relations and interstate conflict. This chapter explores the influence of territory and territorial issues on processes of interstate conflict. I begin by reviewing existing approaches to the study of territory, and existing theoretical efforts to understand the role of territory. I then offer an empirical investig...
متن کاملSection I Interstate Water Allocation Economics Resolving Interstate Water Allocation Conflicts: Tools, Strategies, and Administrative Options
Introduction Interstate water disputes are an increasingly common occurrence throughout the United States, as the demands on transboundary water resources continue to increase in magnitude and diversity. These disputes can involve a variety of water-related issues. In the arid and semi-arid West, the interstate allocation-or "apportionment"-is normally the central and often only concern. In the...
متن کاملA Neural Network Analysis of Militarized Disputes, 1885-1992: Temporal Stability and Causal Complexity
Great progress has been made in predicting and explaining interstate conflict. Improved data, theory, and methods all deserve credit. Yet much remains to be done. First, whereas many variables (e.g., geographical proximity, relative power, alliances, political regime type, economic interdependence) have important effects, even the most successful multivariate analyses leave much of the variance...
متن کاملDisputes, Democracies, and Dependencies: A Reexamination of the Kantian Peace
Militarized interstate disputes are widely thought to be less likely among democratic countries that have high levels of trade and extensive participation in international organizations. We reexamine this broad finding of the Kantian peace literature in the context of a model that incorporates the high degree of dependency among countries. Based on in-sample statistical tests, as well as out-of...
متن کاملWater and Federalism: India's Institutions Governing Inter-State
Executive Summary The paper analyzes the process of resolving interstate water disputes. Indian water-dispute settlement mechanisms are ambiguous and opaque. A cooperative bargaining framework suggests that water can be shared efficiently, with compensating transfers as necessary, if initial water rights are well-defined, and if institutions to facilitate and implement cooperative agreements ar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005